Tuesday, October 10
Draft Published
If you want to follow a sequence of posts to a weblog, you must usually start at the bottom of the web page and work up. If this is your first visit, you may wish to do just that for entries from Sept 1 until Oct 6.
I have just posted the various draft articles in such a way that you may review them in the top - bottom fashion of a printed document. So, for reviewing the drafts, please start with the post just below this one and work your way down.
Please post only general comments on the draft to this post (20:47). Please post specific comments, suggestions, observations, complaints, requests, etc. to the appropriate blog entry. Remember to type your name as the last line of your comments, so that you can feel free to post as "anonymous" (saves all sorts of registration hassles) and we will still know who is who.
(UPDATE: To view and/or post comments, just click on the bottom right phrase that shows the number of existing comments, and a new window with comments should pop up; this new window also includes a text-entry box for you to add your own comment. Remember to include your name as the last line!)
We look forward to the ensuing critique, including (especially?) from those who will be unable to join us in Toronto next week.
Thanks!
I have just posted the various draft articles in such a way that you may review them in the top - bottom fashion of a printed document. So, for reviewing the drafts, please start with the post just below this one and work your way down.
Please post only general comments on the draft to this post (20:47). Please post specific comments, suggestions, observations, complaints, requests, etc. to the appropriate blog entry. Remember to type your name as the last line of your comments, so that you can feel free to post as "anonymous" (saves all sorts of registration hassles) and we will still know who is who.
(UPDATE: To view and/or post comments, just click on the bottom right phrase that shows the number of existing comments, and a new window with comments should pop up; this new window also includes a text-entry box for you to add your own comment. Remember to include your name as the last line!)
We look forward to the ensuing critique, including (especially?) from those who will be unable to join us in Toronto next week.
Thanks!
# posted by Robert Barnes @ 20:47 
Comments:
<< Home
I would recommend we use the spelling "Pediatric" throughout the document and most importantly in our name. This is what CPS, LWPES and ISPAD do and I think we should be consistent with them, even though ESPE uses the Paediatric spelling.
Margaret Lawson
Margaret Lawson
# posted by 
: 10 October, 2006 21:12
: 10 October, 2006 21:12
As per Bob's recent email request...Draft reviewed, seems okay. My question was about who the Charter members are/will be but that has been answered in a more recent post.
Seth Marks
Seth Marks
# posted by : 13 October, 2006 13:15
: 13 October, 2006 13:15
Actually, Margaret, CPS uses the "A", but we can see what the CPEG consensus is. I look forward to A vs. no-A being the most contentious issue next Thursday :)
Bob.
Bob.
Draft seen. It looks fine.
Roberto Bogarin.
Endocrine Fellow at BC Children's Hospital.
Roberto Bogarin.
Endocrine Fellow at BC Children's Hospital.
# posted by : 13 October, 2006 17:11
: 13 October, 2006 17:11
This looks good. Thanks for all of your hard work Bob.
Tracey Bridger
Post a Comment
Tracey Bridger
# posted by : 16 October, 2006 09:52
: 16 October, 2006 09:52 << Home
